The curious incident of the flashing Blackberry in the Night Time

July 14, 2011 by · Comments Off
Filed under: Agency, Customer Engagement, Customer Relationship Management, Social Media 

I love email.  I really do.  I find it fascinating.  If you stand back and look at what it’s become to the modern world it’s fairly staggering.  It’s ingrained itself into cultures and societies the world over.  It’s shaped how we talk to one another and share information.  It’s developed its own unique code of conduct and etiquette – one that is multi layered, intricate and laced with nuance.  The lure of the flashing ‘you’ve got new mail’ LED light on the Blackberry can break the hardiest, most resilient of people at 3 in the morning when you catch a glimpse of the phone on the bedside cabinet.  The golden envelope in the system tray can be the single most disruptive thing on the day you have to get that document written.  It’s powerful stuff.

For example, I had an internal debate that lasted the best part of 30 minutes the other week over the fact that someone had omitted the ‘kind’ from the ‘regards’ in a sign off to me.  You might think it’s not that weird, millions of people opt for the colder, more abrupt signoff however in this instance it was from a person who always, always signs off with a ‘kind’ in front of the regards.  Therefore I was left paralysed in front of my laptop, mind reeling, desperately trying to understand the true meaning of this omission.  “Are they angry with me?” “Is this the sign that the relationship is coming to an end?”.  Once the fear and paranoia subsided I started to become more rational and entertain less dramatic theories i.e. the sender could have just been having a bad day and everyone was getting the same treatment or they were suffering from a dose of fat fingers and deleted the ‘kind’ by accident.  Now, I might be slightly over-dramatising for the purposes of this blog posting but my point is to demonstrate the emotional and psychological clout email has as a communications vehicle.  We’ve all re-read emails 10 times or more desperately seeking to understand the true meaning of the email, isolating then analysing individual phrases or sentences as we search for enlightenment.  This power, when harnessed and channelled correctly can deliver a huge amount of value to marketing campaigns and strategies.

Brands still neglect the use of email.  Still send out generic, one size fits all communications to all and sundry.  Why?  Well, I’ve seen cases where email campaigning has such inertia that it’s become a communications juggernaut bulldozing its way through a yearly comms plan.  In these instances it can be a difficult beast to tame.  But tamed it must be.   To state the obvious email is a vehicle to take a highly personal, relevant, 1-2-1 conversation to the customer/prospect/employee/etc.  It can be subtle and deft in the way in which it engages and influences behaviour and action. It can be hard hitting and blunt.  It can be what you need it to be you but it requires careful thought and an understanding of the medium.  And don’t forget you can test, test, test – don’t burn your data in one hit because you’ve ‘got to get it out of the door’.  Plan ahead.  Think ahead.  Get yourself seen.  In the dark make it light.

We all know that email has been around for a fair old while now.  It is a founding member of the digital age and has well and truly earned its stripes.  It has pretty much guaranteed itself a seat at the table of most modern day marketers when grand plans are hatched.  Developments and new technologies in the digital space have eroded its potency but in the same breath augmented its all round usefulness.  Take mobile for instance, smart phones have meant that email is consumed everywhere (quite literally) but in the same breath advancements around ‘push’ technologies omits email from the communications loop.  Give and take.  Social media platforms report every interaction with triggered emails ensuring the ‘yo-yo’ effect hauls you back in.  So, all in all email is alive, healthy and evolving.  This is especially impressive when you consider the technology hasn’t really evolved in the last few years but the application and use of it has.

Has it got the staying power to still be around in 10 years time?  Undoubtedly yes but in what guise and to what degree I’m not quite sure.  Anyway, must dash, need to check the old inbox.

Blurred Vision – The Changing Landscape of Digital

September 10, 2010 by · Comments Off
Filed under: Agency, Customer Engagement, Marketing Strategy, Social Media 

2 months ago ‘Customer A’ says to me with a beaming smile across his face.

“I’ve set up a Twitter account for the company.  Good hey?”

“Urrmm, no.”

“What do you mean, no?”

“Well why have you done it? And what are you going to Tweet about?”

“Well firstly, everyone’s going on about it.  Secondly, dunno yet, just bits and pieces I suppose, about what’s going on, news, products updates, stuff like that.”

“OK.  We need to talk about this.”

I’ll come back to this…

The lines are blurring.  Landscapes are changing.  Evolving.  The tectonic plates of the digital world are shifting.  What will be left with?  A brave new world or a state of anarchy and disorder?

Overly dramatic, GCSE geography based, blog openings aside, this isn’t news, not by any stretch of the imagination.  The industry has been in a continual state of flux since inception and those within it have excitedly bobbed and weaved their merry little ways through it.  Me included.  However, recent murmurings, trends and movements would indicate something larger is afoot.  Something more significant.

Speed of change and innovation have always been the main driving forces behind evolution in the digital space.  As one channel of communication is born, another dies (or more likely evolves into something different).  More established areas, for example, email, haven’t been afforded the luxury of laurel sitting but have had to diversify and innovate in order to stay current.  All of this has shaped a wonderful, ever changing, high speed world full of colour, chaos and above all opportunity.

Agencies have adapted – we’ve had no choice.  The big ‘oil tanker’ traditional ad agencies, amidst stifled screams of panic, have had to either acquire or restructure (slowly) in an attempt to keep up.  At the other end of the scale the boutique, specialist agencies have ground out successful niches in areas such as SEO, email and more recently social.  This has all made for a very interesting playing field (one that’s unfortunately often left brands and businesses a little unsure as to which way to go and what to do).  All of this is going through a shake up.  A shake up driven by the customer.

OK, exposition done, context given.  Now to the point…

Whilst brands, businesses, agencies, technology providers, etc have been charging around seeking holy grails and the like, the customer (consumer/target audience member) has been quietly and assuredly maturing.  In fact, they’re now the catalysts for change.  They dictate the rules of engagement.  For the second time in this posting I’m stating the obvious.  There’s been a great deal written about the changing customer/brand dynamic, consumer power, etc but that doesn’t necessarily mean businesses and the marketers within them are taking note.  In fact I’m regularly left dumbstruck when a shiny, new piece of digital is unveiled and it whole heartedly neglects the most important thing… the customer, the prospect, the target audience, the very essence of marketing!

Anyway, getting back to the fact of the matter, customers have matured both in terms of expectations and needs. Fact.  But how is this changing digital?  Well, to start with it’s forcing integration, the hard lines that have formed around the main pillars of the digital mix are starting to blur, crack and crumble.  Social media, mobile, viral, search, email, eCRM, web, apps, etc are being mashed up by a gigantic consumer driven pestle and mortar.  The new breed of customers do not consciously differentiate between a social media interaction and a website, between an email and a text message.  To them it’s all part of the same conversation.  A conversation that they want to be relevant, consistent and engaging.  Research recently published in NMA stated a 30%+ drop in the last 6 months in the usage of terms like ‘mobile’ and ‘social media’ across industry blogs, forums, Twitter, etc –  clearly pointing towards an end to ‘siloed’ thinking.

This is good news.  In fact, very good news.  It means people’s hearts, minds and digital marketing plans are being led by the right reasons.  Businesses should be looking at their customer, in finite detail, understanding what makes them tick and then talking to them based on this knowledge.  Don’t charge off setting up a Twitter and Facebook account purely on the basis everyone else has –  will it add anything to the conversation with your customers?  Probably not.  If you’re a plastics manufacturer please don’t look crestfallen when your polymer based tweets haven’t whipped your industry and client base into a frenzy of excitement and awe.  The fact that your 7 followers (all of which are colleagues you’ve bullied into following you) have re-tweeted you (count them) 8 times doesn’t constitute success.  What I’m saying is, businesses shouldn’t be ‘channel led’ but ‘customer led’ and within the digital space this message is starting to come through by virtue of the fact people aren’t talking about ‘Social Media’ incessantly, on loop, 24/7.  It’s a conversational tool, one of many, to harness and use to engage with your customer in the best way possible.  Integrated, consistent thinking and delivery that’s customer centric.  Beautiful.

How do you solve a problem like….CRM?

November 18, 2009 by · Comments Off
Filed under: Social Media 

If I’m totally honest, I’m hardly being a visionary when I say that it’s strategically vital for all organisations to build customer loyalty and increase the ‘share of budget’ available? Research regularly tells us that the most significant increases in profitability are derived by increases in customer retention of as little as five per cent. Compare this to the cost of acquiring new customers – up to 10 times more than retaining an existing one!!. To my mind, it’s no surprise that Companies are focussing on customer retention strategies – often to the budgetary detriment of any new business acquisition programme. Getting the balance right is fundamental – May our effectiveness in retaining business be matched by a cost-efficient acquisition strategy!

My experience is that many companies felt they had ticked this particular box by implementing CRM ( customer relationship management) programmes. The investment made was considerable, the returns promised huge, but in practice the ROI metrics have not been delivered – and these metrics were largely predicated against customer retention and the increased revenue therein! So why is this? An effective CRM strategy comprises two elements –the first, deployment of an effective CRM technology. The second ( and IMHO the one on which organisations consistently fall down) is the strategic use of the CRM data to yield personalised, relevant, timely communications – via the optimal channel (s) – both on & offline. So many organisations concern themselves with new data when the real concern is not how much data they currently own or are able to obtain, but how to use the data effectively once they have it!
The net impact of this is a ‘double whammy’ – not only are organisations not making the returns they planned but they also risk losing long term customers through ignorance and an inability to address them with relevant communications.

The answer to this lies, not in a new technology , but in approaching the management of customer data differently and as the basis for the most basic of all CRM principles – “treating different customers differently”.

By using data to define Customer ( and prospect ) segments, by creating distinct and discrete content channels and by delivering this content across all media, we can accelerate the ROI by allowing businesses to drive profit through managing customer data to deliver intelligent marketing insight.

The Company Blog & Looking After Rabbits

October 30, 2009 by · Comments Off
Filed under: Social Media 

To blog or not to blog?

Many months ago when planning the latest iteration of the Purestone website the inevitable subject of the company Blog arose. A furious debate ensued…

Pro Bloggers:

“We HAVE to have one. We’re a digital marketing agency for christ’s sake. We need to suck our own sweets.”

“It will help our SEO.”

“It gives the company a face, personality and tone of voice well beyond what the website can.”

“It empowers people within the business and gives them an open avenue in which they can communicate and express themselves.”

“I run my own blog and contribute to others so it’s second nature for me.”

Anti Bloggers:

“If it’s not updated on a regular basis it will do far more damage than good.”

“Why should we conform? We’re not an industry sheep in how we go about our business so why start now. Unless there’s a business case and justification for it then surely it’s just a pain in the backside?”

“I’m worried about someone saying the wrong thing and making us look bad or like we haven’t got a scooby.”

“Just who’s going to administer it? Add to it? I’m not, I can tell you that for free.”

By virtue of the fact you’re reading this then clearly we opted to have a company blog.

Above are just some of the soundbites from what was a colourful conversation. Of course, this situation, is by no means unique and we’ve sat in many, many client meetings watching and chairing this exact debate. There’s no simple answer. It needs discussion and it needs an eyes open approach. The potential risks and dangers of running a blog are significant… which nicely leads me onto the main point of posting this entry…

If you’re going to set up a commercially focussed blog then it needs regular content and a marketing strategy of its own to generate interest and traffic. Now, the more observant of you and those who regularly visit Purestone will be thinking ”you need to look at your own blog mate”. You’d be right. We have fallen at both these hurdles.

Now I could say that we did this on purpose as part of an experiment to gauge the damage an unkempt blog can have on a company. No one would really believe me though. The truth of the matter is that despite starting with the best intentions it’s fallen away and the distance between posts has grown. It reminds me of when I was 8 and I wanted a rabbit. “James, you will look after it and feed it every day won’t you? I don’t want to have to be looking after it when you lose interest’… “Yeah, of course, I’ll make it the happiest rabbit ever.” After 6 weeks ‘Pluto’ (my new rabbit) was not happy. His feeding wasn’t probably as clockwork as he’d have liked and his claws (?) were getting a bit on the long side.

When we discussed the blog there were many people in the room nodding enthusiastically and commiting themselves to getting a new rabbit/blog. The difficulty is that we live and breathe digital, day in, day out and we’re so busy doing this for clients that we inevitably fall down the priorities list. Not ideal by any stretch but a reality that most companies are faced with.

So if you’re considering a blog please read and heed the above.

Pluto died at 8 years old, he was a happy and content rabbit after my Mum intervened and looked after him.

James Smee.

Bad Rabbit Keeper of the Year – 1985 – 1993

Pluto the rabbit

Is Facebook the Biggest Waste of Time?

July 15, 2009 by · Comments Off
Filed under: Social Media 

It would appear that the average user spends 4 hours and 39 minutes a month (based on June 2009’s statistics) on Facebook, which is the highest of any of the top ten online brands.

This is all according to the most recent Nielsen report and has been digested and commented on by those reliable chaps at Mashable.

Click here for the full article

Next Page »